Author Guidelines

Editorial Policies

GILI 2026 is committed to the highest standards of publication ethics. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review and plagiarism screening.

Publication Ethics

GILI 2026 highly respects publication ethics and avoids all forms of misconduct. This statement explains the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in publishing a manuscript, including authors, the General Chair, Section Chair, editor-in-chief, peer reviewers, and the publisher. This policy is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Peer Review Process

Every submitted manuscript is first assessed by the editor to determine whether it aligns with the focus and scope of GILI 2026, demonstrates significant originality, and has a low similarity score (checked using Turnitin).

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double-Blind Review). The reviewers' comments and suggestions are evaluated in an editorial board meeting to reach a final decision. The editor will then communicate the decision to the corresponding author along with the reviewers' comments for necessary revisions or responses.

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism

GILI 2026 uses Turnitin as a plagiarism detection tool. Before sending manuscripts to reviewers, the editorial team checks the similarity/plagiarism level. Manuscripts with a similarity score exceeding 20% (without exclusions) will be immediately rejected.

In addition, authors are required to submit a completed and signed Ethics Statement declaring that the paper is free from plagiarism and self-plagiarism, as well as free from unlawful, defamatory, or otherwise inappropriate content that violates the personal or property rights of any individual or entity.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered on the GILI 2026 website will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the conference and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.